A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 28, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would make and deliver a victim E in an influent restaurant near the D office located in C, and that “The Defendant would make a 3D inside, and would make a part of the production of a part of the parts to be sent out to Samsung Electronic, and instead, instead, the Defendant would have granted the approval of the project to grant the 15 million won to 3 managers in Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd., to bear the said money.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he would use the money received from the injured party for personal purposes, such as influenite card payments and repayment of borrowed money, and the victim did not have the intention or ability to make the production of 3D mobile devices out of the market.

The Defendant received 45 million won from the injured party to the corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant on the 29th day of the same month.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On August 30, 201, the Defendant called the victim E at the G office located in Suwon-si, Inc., Ltd. located in Suwon-si, where the Defendant had been employed at the time, to supply television cameras to Samsung Electronic, which is to be manufactured by the Defendant at the direction of the G, and to finally assemble them in Samsung Electronic, and to produce finished products. The victim also has a pro rata to the Samsung Electronic. The victim purchased C risk from the company, “I,” to supply it to Samsung Electronic, and to supply it to Samsung Electronic, and then arrange to supply it to Samsung Electronic through G, and to demand that Samsung Electronic Purchase will bear payment of KRW 20 million with the street funds.”

However, on June 201, the Defendant had already rejected delivery due to the lack of technical capabilities of Samsung C and H when the Defendant presented an explanatory note on the part of Samsung Electronic.