logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.18 2015가합65991
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 25, 2011, Suwon District Court 201 201Mo26 decided that the status of the party to the lawsuit was primarily supplied to Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Tsung Electronic Co., Ltd.”), and that A was appointed as a manager and took over the litigation procedure of this case since B was appointed as a manager.

(hereinafter “Defendant” is not divided into Alti Electronic Co., Ltd. and the manager. The Plaintiff is a subsidiary of Mauriium Co., Ltd., Ltd., and is a company with the purpose of manufacturing Potasium jointsium.

B. On February 2013, the Plaintiff entered into and supplied goods supply contract. Around February 2013, the part used by the Defendant for the mobile phone main body (BODY) to be supplied to Samsung Industries, the Plaintiff is a main body of the structure that sets the elclocks of the mobile phones (LRBACKT) mobile phone elclocks as the raw material of the elcium. However, the Plaintiff is a precise adjustment method that injects melt metal into the compulsory machine processing unit that is accurately consistent with the necessary main body form to obtain the same main body as gold. Upon receiving a proposal from the Defendant to receive a large quantity from Samsung electronics, the Plaintiff agreed to entrust the Plaintiff with some of the manufacturing volume of the elclocks ordered by the Defendant and the Defendant on March 22, 2013 (hereinafter “instant trading agreement”).

(2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant completed the preparation for the mass production of the Marine Pium 1, 2013, and the instant case on August 7, 2013, to be supplied to the Defendant, on the basis of the quantity received by the Defendant, the volume distribution under Article 4 (Quantities Distribution) of the Trade Agreement is determined by mutual consultation between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the basis of the quantity received by the Defendant, and ensure that the quantity resulting from facility investment and the adequate profit ratio are guaranteed.

arrow