logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.02.20 2017고단2934
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 14, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor due to interference with the performance of official duties in the Seo-gu District Court’s Branch Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on October 18, 2017.

[Criminal facts] On November 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was assigned to the slope D belonging to the Seo-gu Police Station C District Branch of Seo-gu Police Station, Seo-gu, Seoul, which dealt with a separate case of reporting 112, on the 31-lane 31,00, with the compensation for the Seo-gu, Daegu-gu Government Bonds (Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu) around 21:30 on November 25, 2017 without any reason.

“The expression was expressed as “...”

계속하여 피고 인은 위 D와 함께 112 신고 사건을 처리하고 있던 같은 지구대 소속 경장 E으로부터 귀가할 것을 권유 받자 “ 시발 놈 아 좆 만한 놈은 빠져 라 ”라고 욕설을 하며 오른손을 들어 위 E을 때리려는 시늉을 하고, 위 E이 피고인에게 동영상 촬영사실을 고지한 후 스마트 폰으로 동영상을 촬영하자, “ 씨 발 너 거들 할 수 있는 게 그거밖에 더 있더나, 찍어 봐라. ”라고 말하며 오른손으로 위 E의 목을 잡아 1회 밀고, 양손으로 가슴을 3회 밀어 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by police officers E 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The C District Office shall be located;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to refer to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (informating the text of the judgment and reporting on the period of repeated crimes);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes are punished several times, including punishment, and in particular, there are questions as to whether the Defendant committed a crime without any justifiable reason, such as obstructing another person from committing a crime, and neglecting that person’s act, such as obstructing another person’s performance of official duties, and obstructing another person from committing a crime without any justifiable reason.

3.2

arrow