logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고단865
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant who damaged property is between the injured party B and the married couple, and is one of the neighbors known to more than 10 years.

On December 12, 2015, at around 23:30 on December 23:30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported the Defendant’s house located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu apartment operation 106, to return home with the victim C; and (b) confirmed the relationship between the two persons; (c) on the ground that the two persons are different from the Defendant’s question at the time of the victim and C, the Defendant’s joint ownership of the victim and the victim, and broken down one Samsung electronic facsimile with the amounting to KRW 2.50,00 won, and one of the Samsungchi-type kimchi-type with the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on the grounds that the slope G belonging to the F District of the Police Station F District of the Jung-gu Police Station, called out after having received the Defendant’s desire and received the report of 112 from the Defendant at the same time and place as paragraph 1, shall enter into the house with a new shot G, which was called out. He shall go to her. He shall go to her own house, and she shall go to her house with a new shot, and she shall go to her house,” and she shall go to her.

The term "G" and "I am to am for food," and the circumstances surrounding the district group's affiliation thereof give a warning to arrest a flagrant offender while leaving the defendant. He is only dead of how to arrest a son.

"........... ............................ the

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against B, G, and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as arrest reports on the occurrence of an injury, interference with the performance of official duties, investigation reports (on-site conditions, etc.), investigation reports (in cases of site conditions, etc. and accompanying photographs of victims), and investigation reports (in

1. Articles 136 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade (Joint Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) are 1.

arrow