Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an accountant in charge of G candidate's accounting, who was going out of the F-Gun election, enforced June 4, 2014, and Defendant B is the actual operator of H who conducts the work of removing election campaign speech-free vehicles.

1. Defendant A

A. On June 2014, the Defendant entered false statements in the document evidencing the disbursement of election expenses, false statements in the account book, and false statements in the accounting report in G candidate election office located in Nam-nam, and the Defendant entered the estimate, contract, written request, and tax invoice as if he purchased KRW 1,210,000,00,000, even though he purchased a vehicle for the election campaign speech of the G candidate from B in the amount of KRW 10,450,00,000, in the account book for the revenue and expenditure of election expenses.

After that, on July 1, 2014, the Defendant submitted an accounting report related to election expenses to the election commission located in the JJ, and submitted an accounting report in which evidentiary documents such as false tax invoices and the revenue and expenditure books for election expenses are falsely entered.

As a result, the Defendant, who is the accountant in charge of the candidate in the election for public office, falsely entered receipts and other documentary evidence related to the election expenses, entered them in the accounting book, and made a false entry in the accounting report on the election expenses without any justifiable reason.

B. On June 24, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 2,00,000 from L the purchase price of a candidate’s election campaign speech vehicle increased falsely, such as the entry in paragraph A, from a G candidate’s election office located in Seoul Special Self-Governing Province, to a deposit account in the name other than the deposit account (Seoul BankK) of the candidate’s G candidate who was reported to the election commission.

As a result, the defendant received election expenses without going through a deposit account reported to the election commission.

2. Defendant B: (a) around June 2014.