logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.08.08 2012고합1267
정치자금법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of 800,000 won and by a fine of 500,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was a 19th National Assembly member's 19th National Assembly election implemented on April 11, 2012 who was sent to the F Party as a candidate for the F Party in Seoul E-election, and Defendant B was reported to the G Election Commission as a person in charge of accounting of Defendant A on March 23, 2012.

1. Revenues and expenditure of political funds of a candidate and a preliminary candidate to run in an election for public office for the defendant A shall be performed only by the person in charge of accounting, and even when the person in charge of accounting receives and disburses political funds, they shall be performed through the deposit account reported to the competent

On March 26, 2012, the Defendant paid KRW 6,00,000 to H (the representative I; hereinafter “H”) Co., Ltd., Ltd. (the Defendant’s performance expenses) for the production of the Defendant’s election promotional videos, by ordering J, who is the Defendant’s performance expenses, to transfer the said KRW 6,00,000 from a new bank account under the name of K (the wife) to the bank account in the name of K (the name of K) where the recording and supervision of the video was carried out, and simultaneously disbursed political funds in a manner that is not related to election expenses even if the person in charge of accounting is not in charge of accounting, and at the same time, did not go through the deposit account reported to the competent election commission.

2. On May 11, 2012, the Defendants submitted a report on revenues and expenditures of political funds, such as election expenses, in relation to the above election to the G Election Commission. The Defendants conspired to omit the production cost of video products, which were, or should be, paid to H, in order to conceal the expenditure of some election expenses, or the production cost of video pictures or the production cost of historical field, which was paid to H on March 26, 2012, and submitted an accounting report stating the total amount of election expenses paid as KRW 173,168,580, without stating the disbursement amount of KRW 6,000, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make an accounting report on election expenses after an election for public office, omitted the above 6,000,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow