logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2012.08.30 2012고정473
사문서위조등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who operates the international marriage brokerage company called Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, and the defendant A is a person who was trying to enter into an international marriage with Vietnam women through the above company.

The Defendants decided that the monthly rent contract is insufficient for Defendant A to certify property necessary for Vietnam women and international marriage, and that the rent contract is necessary. Defendant A conspired to prepare a rent contract and submit it to the Korean consular official located in Vietnam without the consent of the lessor G with respect to the Daejeon Middle-gu, where Defendant A live in the monthly rent without the consent of the lessor.

Accordingly, around September 2010, Defendant A, even though he was aware of the fact that the lessor’s seal is required to prepare a charter contract, Defendant B, who had to use it in the said section, had the seal manager affix the seal under the name of G, and put it to B.

In addition, at the above office of "E" operated by Defendant B around that time, Defendant B prepared a contract stating the term 5 million won of the deposit contract for the deposit from September 15, 2010 to September 14, 2012 as "the term 5 million won, the balance 25 million won, the lessor, and the lessee A" with respect to the second floor of the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F Housing using a computer, and printed out the document stating the above contents, and affixed a seal on the G’s name that Defendant A created.

After all, Defendant B sent a forged lease contract to “H” in Vietnam by mail to the Korean consular official located in Vietnam on September 12, 2010 through March 13, 2010.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge and use one copy of G name lease contract without authority for the purpose of exercising.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Prosecutorial suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The lease contract;

1.A seal-related Acts and subordinate statutes, owned by B, shall apply 1.

arrow