A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of uttering of forged official documents at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 22, 2015.

1. Around February 24, 2012, the Defendant, along with a named woman, presented to B, who knew of the forgery, a resident registration certificate for E in the name of the head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, accompanied by a woman’s photograph on a resident registration certificate indicating the content of “C”, address, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D”, etc., in a coffee shop near Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government No. 3, 2012, and exercised it.

Accordingly, the defendant used a forged official document in collusion with a woman in unsound name.

2. The fraud defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, entered the victim B's personal information in the lessor column of the lease contract, entered the tenant's personal information in the lessee column, entered "240 million won" in the deposit column, affixed a false E's seal and affixed a forged E's seal, and presented a forged lease contract under the E's name. "I will lend KRW 100 million as security within one year if I will lend the lease contract as security." In addition, I suggested a forged E's resident registration certificate as stated in Paragraph 1.

However, in fact, the above lease contract is forged, and since women who participated in the contract site were not the lessor, there was no intention or ability to repay the above lease deposit even if they borrowed money from the victim as collateral because they did not actually borrow money from the lessor.

The defendant and a female under name was accused of the victim as such, and the victim was delivered KRW 83,250,000 from the victim's seat.

Accordingly, the defendant was delivered property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the false female.

Summary of Evidence

1..