1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The Defendants conspired to assign the following stolens as follows.

A prosecutor was indicted as “drawing the transfer of stolen property,” but is recognized as “transfer of stolen property ex officio and without modification of an indictment, according to facts known through the evidence investigated by this court.”

This is because the basic factual basis is identical and there is no concern to give substantial disadvantage to the defendants' exercise of their right to defense.

1. On July 2008, the Defendants received from E (a male living together with the Defendant A) a scambling from the victim F, etc. at the residence of the Defendants in the Seocho-si, Seocho-si, 2008.

After being aware of the fact that it is a stolen, the Defendants sold to I, the owner of the business, who was a gold bank G 1st, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and sold the said gold gling to 10,000 won per gold (10,000 won per gold).

2. On October 2008, the Defendants received one half of the male use, etc. owned by the victimJ, from E, at the places described in paragraph 1 as of October 2008, and from E as well.

After being aware of the fact that it is a stolen, the Defendants sold 1,00,000 won per gold (10,000 won per gold) to I, the owner of the business, who is a gold bank G 1st, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

3. On November 2008, the Defendants received 23 gold bars owned by the Victim K, etc. at the place described in paragraph 1 as of November 1, 2008, that they stolen from E.

After being aware of the fact that it is a stolen, the Defendants sold the gold-in, etc. to I, a business owner, who was a gold bank G 1st century in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and sold the said gold-in, etc. to I (100,000 won per gold).

4. On August 2009, the Defendants received four (4) the victim L Babababa, etc. from the place described in paragraph 1, and from E, they stolen from E.

The Defendants knew that it is a stolen, and around that time the Defendants were the 1st G of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as the H “H” bank and the I, the main owner of the business.