Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.
2. Ex officio determination
A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant would purchase a mobile phone from the person who reported and contacted the Internet advertising writing to the effect that he can purchase a mobile phone, and accordingly, the Defendant attempted to purchase it and deliver it to the person who purchased it.
1. On October 21, 2012, around 15:30 on October 21, 2012, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by purchasing 3.10,00 won of the market price of the victim DNA owned by the victim who stolen at a different place from C in front of the Seocheonbuk-dong 316-2, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, 316-2.
2. At around 13:30 on October 31, 2012, the Defendant purchased a cell phone of the victim H2 mobile phone from G on the street in front of the F University located in Manyang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-si, and acquired stolen goods in KRW 40,00 of the price knowing that it was stolen.
3. On October 31, 2012, around 14:40 on October 31, 2012, the Defendant: (a) purchased a cellphone 4 mobile phone of a 800,000 won from the victim J, which he had stolen from I in front of the Seoul Southern Terminal Station located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seoul, at a different place; and (b) acquired stolen goods by purchasing one cell phone of a 4 mobile phone of a 800,000 won amount, even
B. According to the records, on August 8, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment, three years of probation, two years of probation, and two hundred hours of community service order on the grounds of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the judgment became final and conclusive. The criminal facts of the above final judgment in collusion with L, etc. by the Defendant from July 25, 2012 to March 2013.