logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.14 2018누72934
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The grounds for the plaintiff's assertion in the trial court are not significantly different from the argument in the trial of the first instance, and even if the evidence and the additional evidence submitted in the trial of the first instance are reviewed, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's assertion is recognized as legitimate.

Therefore, the reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is as follows: "Nos. 4 through 17" in Section 10 of Section 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "Nos. 4, 5, 12"; "Nos. 1, 2, and 3" in Section 12 of Section 3 shall be "Nos. 3, 3, 6, and 8"; and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance shall be the same as that for the judgment of first instance, except for cases where "Nos. 3, 2, and 3" are "Nos. 3, 6, and 8". Thus, it shall

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow