beta
Text
The judgment of the first instance, including the claim that has been reduced by this Court, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
Reasons
1. Quotation of the first instance judgment
A. The defendant's grounds for appeal are not significantly different from the argument in the first instance court, and the fact-finding and judgment in the first instance court are justified even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court was neglected by this court.
The reasons for the judgment of this court are as follows.
With the exception of dismissal or addition as mentioned in paragraph (4), the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part on the “contest”) is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4
B. The portion of the judgment of the court of first instance, “as of No. 3, No. 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance” was “as of the following to No. 9, the following 26,200,905 won [i.e., KRW 26,203,905 for calculation - KRW 28,704,573 - KRW 51,000 - 16,908,478), or the Plaintiff’s 26,200,905 won calculated by deducting the sum of KRW 16,908,478 for the Plaintiff’s additional construction costs to be paid to Ma.”
[.] There is an obligation to pay the ...."
In the first instance judgment No. 3, No. 18 of the first instance judgment, the part “from the following to the 1990,000 won” shall read “from the following to the 1990,00 won at the expense of the building N, E,O, and D, the water leakage repair work and the ceiling work, and the distribution work.”
If the judgment of the court of first instance No. 4, 51,00,000 won (“1,00,000 won”) is added as follows: “The Plaintiff’s internal director L shall pay to the Defendant’s wife M.”
"1,634,920 won, - 28,705,080 won - 5,134,920 won, - 134,920 won, - 1,634,920 won, - 28,705,000 won, - 28,705,080 won - 51 million won, - 1,340,00 won, - 1,340,00 won.
Nos. 4, 11, and 12 of the first instance judgment, No. 5 of the first instance judgment, and “No. 12 of the following.” Thus, the part up to the first instance judgment arose from No. 4, 11, and 12 of the instant building, which the Plaintiff claims.