1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion even if the evidence submitted at the trial was examined again, is recognized as legitimate.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, inasmuch as the "disposition 16 of the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance" is deemed to be "disposition 16 of the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance," the "Continuance 7" of the third half is deemed to be "Continuance 7", the "209" of the first 10 shall be deemed to be "Supreme Court 209", and the "10 evidence" of the first 11 shall be deemed to be "12 evidence (including all branch numbers)", and it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.