1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the "credit guarantee agreement of this case" in Part 2, Part 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as "each credit guarantee agreement of this case"; (b) Part 3, No. 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance [the grounds for recognition] is added to the part 3, No. 3, No. 16, and No. 17 of the judgment of this case; (c) the "Defendant" in Part 3, No. 16, No. 17 of the judgment of this case is changed as "B"; and (d) Part 5, No. 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "200Da74621" in Part 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "207Da74621"; and therefore,

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case that was changed in exchange at the trial of the party is dismissed as it is without merit (the plaintiff's claim for the revocation of fraudulent act and return of originals to the real estate of this case was withdrawn by the exchange change at the trial). It is so decided as per Disposition.