1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 3, 1992, the Plaintiff (B) entered the Navy and was transferred to the Navy as noncommissioned Officer on October 24, 1992, and was discharged on December 18, 1994 while serving.

B. On February 12, 1993, the Plaintiff, who worked as C personnel at the distribution center of the military team support team, was injured by the deck during the maritime oil support training and the pipe was cut off.

As the Plaintiff was sent without any specific treatment but the symptoms worse, on August 3, 1993, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the nuclear escape certificate and the 4-5 left-hand side (proof)” after receiving the treatment on the hye portion from the National Defense Waterworks Hospital, and was hospitalized at the hospital around September 11, 1993.

After that, the result of the examination of the Masan Integrated Hospital, the final diagnosis was conducted with the Masan Masan Masan Madrogate, L4-5 times survey, L4-5 times survey, and the Masan Masan Madrog escape certificate, the right side.

C. After March 5, 1994, the Plaintiff discharged the Plaintiff on the ground that “after the stabilization fee, symptoms have improved.”

On September 8, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State with respect to the injury, alleging that he/she had gone to know that he/she had gone to know due to the foregoing accident, as “hive disc.”

E. The Defendant, following the deliberation of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, notified the Plaintiff on January 19, 2012, on the ground that “it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship between the disease that occurred at the time of military service and the present wound” on the ground that “it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship between the disease that occurred at the time of military service and the present wound” was discharged from military service after the due date without any surgical treatment, and that it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship between the disease that occurred at the time of military service and the present wound.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”)

F. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on April 2, 2012, but was dismissed on June 12, 2012.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, and 10 shall include each number.