1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff entered the Army on March 17, 1992 and was discharged from military service on June 9, 1994.

B. On August 8, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with respect to the person who rendered distinguished services to the State of distinguished services to the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff completed a shock training in 1993 and caused a lusence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da44-5, Sept. 8, 2013).

C. On December 11, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the eligibility of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant wounds are not deemed to have been caused or aggravated by proximate causal relation with the military performance of official duties, following the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, Eul Nos. 1-2 and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had continued to and repeated shocked during the training process, and served as an driver’s disease after which the Plaintiff had been forced to blickly and repeatedly during the training process, and caused blurgical pain and blurgosis in the training course around April 1993. As a result, the Plaintiff caused the instant wound due to the high-ranking training during military service, etc.

Therefore, since there is a proximate causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s military service and the instant difference, the Defendant’s disposition of this case is unlawful.

B. The facts of recognition are indicated as follows: (a) on July 3, 1992, the medical records of the Plaintiff’s patient’s patient’s patient’s patient’s patient’s care record: (b) on April 23, 1993, it is indicated as “abrutation of symptoms during eculation on April 19, 1993; and (c) on May 24, 1993, as “abrut flut disc L4-5, estimated diagnostic signboard escape certificate L4-5 expansion flick in light of CT on May 10, 193.”

On June 28, 1993, ‘Clinical Records of the 1993 clinical Records', ‘the above symptoms have deteriorated in April 93.'