1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff was discharged from military service on April 13, 1996 while serving at the Army on October 13, 1994 (the plaintiff was discharged from military service).

B. On July 20, 201, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the Defendant on July 20, 201 with the “Plag escape certificate L4-5” as the filing of an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the Defendant, and subsequently applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on December 12, 201.

C. After the deliberation of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff on March 27, 2012 on the ground that “It is difficult to recognize a substantial causal relationship with the military performance of official duties in light of the fact that the Defendant was discharged from military service without an surgery, and was discharged from military service on October 13, 1995, whose records were diagnosed as “protruding escape certificate L5-S1”, but was diagnosed as “protruding escape certificate L5-S1”, but the Defendant was discharged from military service without an surgery.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”)

D. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on June 19, 2012, but was dismissed on September 18, 2012.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3 (including virtual numbers), the whole purport of oral argument

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was healthy before entering the military, without any problems, and was judged as normal at the time of the draft physical and the enlistment. During the training in the training center, the Plaintiff got off with the Plaintiff’s behavior while walking out.

Since then, during the night training on September 29, 1995, so it was serious that it was beyond the ridge of the training site during the night training.

At the time, the military officer recommended the Plaintiff to perform an operation, but the mother is.