logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2020.04.01 2020고단138
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On March 25, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months in the June of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the credit support of the Suwon District Court on March 25, 2019, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 2, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

1. From around 15:52 on December 9, 2019, the Defendant driven a motor bicycle at approximately 6 km section from the front of the oil station located in Ischeon-si, Gyeonggi-do, to the vicinity of the mountain village located in the Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, without a motorcycle driver’s license.

2. On March 25, 2019, the Defendant is a person who has been sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million in the same court on September 23, 2016 in the same court as the same offense, etc., for the following reasons: (a) the period of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for six months; and (b) the period of fine of KRW 3 million in the same court on September 23, 2016; and (c) the same court on March 2, 2016.

On December 9, 2019, at around 15:52, the Defendant was required to comply with a drinking test by inserting the breath on the road in front of the monthly mountain, and the Defendant did not comply with the request for a drinking test by the above police officer without justifiable grounds, even though he was required to comply with the request for a drinking test by inserting the breath, which was dispatched to the site after receiving a report, on considerable grounds to suspect that he was driving the breath under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling in the entrance.

As a result, the Defendant again refused to take a drinking test to a person who has violated the prohibition of drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement, investigation report, and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Cinematographic CDs;

1. Previous records: Inquiries and inquiries, and application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

arrow