Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 25, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the credit branch of Suwon District Court on July 25, 2007. On January 16, 2019, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the credit branch of Suwon District Court.
On July 12, 2019, at around 21:45, the Defendant was in the front of the Do in Ischeon-si C, to the front of the Escopian conference located in Ischeon-si D, and was reported as a drinking in about about 30 meters from the 30-meter direction of the Escopic road in the front of the Escopic conference, and was called for, the Defendant was scopic from the police box G, etc. of the Escopic Police Station, etc., and was found to have driven under the influence of alcohol, such as heavy snow and rain, and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as a scopic and unscopic distance. On the same day, the Defendant did not comply with a request for a drinking test by
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Evidence and photographs of the reporter;
1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;
1. Report on the situation of running a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol;
1. Application of statutes concerning criminal records;
1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The fact that the sentence of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order was imposed twice due to drinking alcohol driving on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) was recently punished on or around 2019 shall be considered disadvantageous circumstances, and the fact that it is human being and reflects shall be considered favorable circumstances.
In this regard, all the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, distance, driving distance, and motor vehicles, are considered as follows.