logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2012. 08. 29. 선고 2012누466 판결
과세처분에 대한 행정소송은 심사청구 또는 심판청구를 거치지 아니하면 제기할 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Chuncheon District Court 201Guhap939 (2012.05.08)

Title

Administrative litigation against a taxation disposition shall not be filed without a request for examination or adjudgment.

Summary

(1) According to the judgment of the court of first instance, an administrative litigation against an illegal taxation can not be filed without going through a request for examination, a request for adjudication, and a decision thereon. The plaintiff voluntarily recognized that the lawsuit of this case was filed without going through a prior trial procedure, such as a request for adjudication, etc.

Related statutes

Article 56 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

(Chuncheon)Revocation of revocation of the imposition of value-added tax 2012Nu466

Plaintiff and appellant

WonAAAA

Defendant, Appellant

hill of the tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Chuncheon District Court Decision 2011Guhap939 Decided May 8, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

July 18, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

August 29, 2012

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's imposition of value-added tax of KRW 000, and value-added tax of KRW 000 on March 2, 201 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is as follows. On July 19, 2012, the second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance [the plaintiff filed an objection against the disposition of this case with the defendant around July 19, 2012, which was 90 days after the date of closing the argument of the court of first instance. However, an objection shall be filed within 90 days after the date of receiving a notice of tax payment (see Articles 66 (6) and 61 (1) of the Framework Act on National Taxes). The plaintiff received a notice of tax payment on the disposition of this case on December 14, 201, and March 8, 2012 (see Articles 6 (1) and 61 (2) and 90Nu8091, Jun. 25, 191). Thus, the plaintiff's objection cannot be dismissed, and the plaintiff's appeal of this case cannot be exempted from the judgment of second instance due to Article 28 (2) of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow