logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2012. 05. 08. 선고 2011구합939 판결
과세처분에 대한 행정소송은 심사청구 또는 심판청구와 그에 대한 결정을 거치지 아니하면 제기할 수 없음[각하]
Title

An administrative litigation against a taxation disposition shall not be filed unless a request for review, or a request for trial, and a decision thereon is made.

Summary

Administrative litigation against illegal taxation cannot be filed without going through a request for examination, a request for adjudication, and a decision thereon. The plaintiff himself/herself recognizes that the lawsuit of this case was filed without going through a prior trial procedure, such as a request for adjudication, etc., and the lawsuit of this case is illegal because it does not go through

Related statutes

Article 56 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2011 disposition of revocation of imposition of value-added tax

Plaintiff

Won XX

Defendant

hill of the tax office

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 24, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

May 8, 2012

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim

The Defendant’s imposition of value-added tax of KRW 000 on December 1, 201, and value-added tax of KRW 000 on March 2, 2012 against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

On December 1, 2011, the Defendant issued a notice of each decision on KRW 000 of the value-added tax (including additional tax) on March 2, 2012 on the ground that the Plaintiff’s return of value-added tax was filed on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s return of the scheduled value-added tax, final and conclusive, and reported the return of the reported return of the value-added tax for the reason that the Plaintiff’s return of the return of the value-added tax for the second period in March 2, 2012 was filed for omission in sales and unfair purchase (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 7, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the lawsuit of this case is lawful

A. The Plaintiff, in 2011, did not have the tax base that serves as the basis for the assessment of value-added tax, and the instant disposition, which was conducted on the premise that the tax base exists, is unlawful, and sought revocation thereof.

B. First, we examine the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit.

Article 56(2) of the Framework Act on National Taxes provides that an administrative litigation against an unlawful taxation may not be filed without going through a request for examination or adjudgment and a decision thereon. However, the Plaintiff voluntarily recognizes that the instant lawsuit was filed without going through a prior trial procedure, such as a request for examination or adjudgment. As such, the instant lawsuit is unlawful as it does not go through a lawful prior trial procedure.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow