All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasoning of the appeal by the Defendants is unreasonable as the punishment of the lower judgment (the Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, etc.; the Defendant B: fine of two million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The act of arranging sexual traffic to the grounds of appeal is a crime that has a great impact on the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex. Therefore, in order to prevent such act, there is a need to strictly punish the parties who run illegal sexual traffic establishments. The Defendants are able to engage in healthy occupational activities with a healthy male with 20 to 30 vehicles. The Defendants are well aware that they are illegal, and have operated or worked in this case's sexual traffic establishments. In particular, Defendant A has a strong attitude in law, such as resumption of business at the same place after regulating the past, even though there was a strong force of regulating the sex trade establishments in several times, and this is more likely to exceed the disadvantage caused by punishment. Thus, there is no reason to believe that there is a strict punishment. Considering that there is no reason to believe that the Defendants' punishment on the punishment of this case's crime methods, circumstances, after the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the size and age of the instant sexual traffic establishments, the size of the profits of the Defendants, and various conditions indicated in the arguments.

3. The defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals by the defendants are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.