The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment of the court below (the fine of KRW 3,00,000) is too unreasonable.

The Defendant is short of the period of employment in the instant commercial sex acts and seems to have no profit from the acquisition.

However, this is due to the incidental external circumstances that the defendant was put into practice immediately after the commencement of his service, and it is not due to the defendant's arbitrary decision, and the defendant's work at the sex trafficking business establishment of this case is well known that it is illegal, and the act of arranging sexual traffic is highly harmful to the sound sex culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and thus there is a need to strictly punish the party who operates the sex trafficking business establishment in order to prevent it. In addition, considering various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, such as the method of the crime of this case, background, circumstance after the crime, circumstance after the crime, age, character and behavior of the defendant, and occupation, the punishment of the court below is unlimited, and it is not recognized that the defendant's argument is unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.