The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The main point of the defendant's appeal is that the punishment of the court below (two years of suspended sentence in August, fine of eight million won, probation, community service, etc.) is too unreasonable.

Since the act of arranging sexual traffic is of great harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, there is a need to strictly punish the parties who operate the sexual traffic business establishment in order to prevent such act. The defendant has been sentenced to a fine of 7 million won on April 7, 2011 due to the criminal fact that the sexual traffic was arranging sexual traffic at the instant business establishment from the end of January 2010 to August 3, 2010. Nevertheless, the defendant has a serious attitude in the view of the law, such as continuing to operate the sexual traffic business establishment while renewal of the lease agreement with the instant business establishment on December 14, 201, taking into account various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, such as the method, period of crime, background of crime, circumstances after the crime, profit size, Defendant's age and character, etc., the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.