The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the instant crime, the act of arranging sexual traffic is a crime that has a great impact on the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the women’s sex, and thus, in order to prevent such act, there is a need to strictly punish the party who has operated a sexual traffic business establishment. In addition, considering various sentencing conditions as indicated in the instant argument, such as the method of the instant crime, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, occupation and criminal record, etc., the punishment of the lower judgment (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two hours of community service order, 120 hours) cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the Defendant

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.