beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From the end of July 2015, the Defendant: (a) concluded a lease contract with the term “2 years from November 10, 2014 to November 9, 2016” with respect to Seo-gu Btel C, Seo-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant owned by the Defendant; (b) however, the Defendant attempted to obtain a loan from the victim by forging the said lease contract with the content that the deposit amount of the said lease is KRW 20 million; and (c) filed a forged lease contract with the victim D; and (d) applied for a loan from the victim.
1. From the end of July 2015, the Defendant forged private documents at the FF Agricultural Partnership Office operated by the Defendant in Yong-Gun, Yong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant entered “G”, “J” in the name column, “J” in the name column, “K” in the resident registration number column, “K” in the contract date column, “this million won” in the monthly rent column, “230,000” in the monthly rent column, and “230,00 in the lease contract term column” in the name of G from November 10, 2014 to November 10, 2016.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the lease contract in the name of the above G, a private document on rights and duties.
2. On July 2015, the Defendant entered into a false statement, such as: (a) the Plaintiff filed an application for a loan to the M&A’s employees in charge of lending from the victim’s association, who knew of the forgery of a lease agreement as referred to in paragraph (1), and entered into a lease agreement of KRW 20 million in the instant officetel C; and (b) the Defendant submitted a forged lease agreement with the evidence as seen above.
However, the above officetel could not get a loan of KRW 50 million because the lease contract of KRW 55 million was concluded, and the security value was low.
As above, the defendant deceivings the above M.