beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who operated the “Djuk” in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu.
In around 209, the Defendant commenced the construction work of the studio-gu remodeling at the above 2009, but the construction fund is insufficient. As the apartment owned by the Defendant, which entered into a lease contract, only entered into a "monthly lease contract" and accordingly, he thought that the above apartment is used for the construction fund by forging the lease contract as if the value of security is adequate.
1. On June 11, 2009, the Defendant forged private document: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Dong-gu, 306 Dong-dong, 110, and (b) on the location of the apartment lease agreement, the Defendant used a computer projected log in the column for the location of the apartment; (b) “Seoul-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do; (c) 302 Dong-dong, 1407 Dong; and (d) in the column for the “security deposit”, the Defendant paid KRW 10,000,000 (Won 10,000) in the column for each 13th day of each month to the lessor (FF); and (c) in the column for the “leased”, the Defendant prepared and sealed the document “Seoul-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, 306 Dong, 110, G, and A, with the name and seal of the said Hacheon-si; and
Accordingly, the defendant, without authority, forged one copy of a lease agreement in the name of J, a private document on rights and obligations.
2. On June 11, 2009, the Defendant: (a) issued the forged lease agreement as if it were a document duly formed; (b) around June 11, 2009, at the office of the lending company’s office, the third floor of the “L” to the above lending company employees of the above lending company, who knew of the forgery; and (c) exercised it as if it were a document duly formed. (d) On March 2, 200, the Defendant was merely a monthly sales contract for KRW 10 million to the victim N via the above M at the date and place specified in paragraph (2).
The right to collateral security has been established on the above apartment.