logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.09.08 2016고정986
자동차관리법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 High Court Decision 986]

1. An automobile in violation of the Automobile Management Act shall be operated by the owner of the automobile or a person entrusted with the operation of the automobile by the owner of the automobile;

Nevertheless, on June 2015, the Defendant paid KRW 1.5 million to a person who was not the name of the Defendant, acquired a car owned by B, which is a land for living, and operated the said car at the street in front of 18,000, around May 21, 2016 without being entrusted with matters concerning operation, etc. by B.

2. On May 21, 2016, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Insurance Act: (a) was a person holding CG car; and (b) operated CG car not covered by mandatory insurance on the street 18th century.

[2016 High Court Decision 987]

1. A person who takes over a motor vehicle registered in violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act shall file an application for the registration of transfer of ownership of a motor vehicle with the Mayor/Do Governor within 15 days;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not apply for the registration of transfer of the ownership of a motor vehicle within 15 days without justifiable grounds, even though he/she received C's free-to-land from a person under B's name due to his/her in-house name in order to take over the C's free-to-land in the ancient city around July 2015

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of Cchip car.

On May 29, 2016, the Defendant operated a mandatory insurance policy even agricultural and fishery products in Ansan City, which were located in the 312-ro of Ansan-si and the Dong and Dong of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, 312, on the street in front of each market, on May 29, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 High Court Decision 986]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each entry in the arrest report of the occurrence of the case, inquiry into mandatory insurance, and report of internal investigation (the statement in the name of the vehicle)

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The arrest report of the occurrence of the case, C's franchise and notification of the TG Motor Vehicle Registration Register (A), vehicles violating the Motor Vehicle Management Act (C), and the application of the mandatory insurance-related Acts and subordinate statutes.

arrow