(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고단10

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고단10

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 5, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law at the Daegu District Court on December 5, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence on October 27, 2014.

On December 16, 2014, at a D restaurant located in Yongcheon-si C around 15:40 on December 16, 2014, the Defendant used the victim E (52 taxes) and drinking alcohol on the ground that the victim went at his/her own house, and used the victim's head part to take one time on the ground that the victim took a dangerous object at his/her house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol against E;

1. Each image of a photograph (the face of a victim and the scene of a case) and a photograph;

1. Previous convictions: The defendant asserts to the effect that he/she does not have a head of the victim as the person who made the scrap in his/her body. The defendant asserts that he/she does not have a head of the victim.

The following circumstances revealed by the evidence revealed by the victim, namely, the victim was investigated by the police, and the victim made a statement to the effect that he was faced with the defendant's head by affixing his head as the steel re-appellant, and the witness F also made a statement to the effect that he corresponds to the victim's above police statement at this court and investigation agency. The victim was sent to the victim's residence at the time of the occurrence of this case, the victim was faced with the victim's head at the time of the victim's head, the victim was pushed, and the victim was faced with the display stand in the restaurant, but the victim's upper part was argued to the effect that the victim was faced with the victim at the time of the victim's head, but the victim's upper part of the victim's body did not appear to have been caused by the same reason as the defendant's assertion. The victim stated in this court that the defendant was not the victim's re-appellant, but it is difficult to believe this in light of the various circumstances and the victim's attitude of statement at the court.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2015.07.17 2015노61

-서울서부지방법원 2014.02.13 2013노1234

-수원지방법원 2015.06.03 2014노4231

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.11.24 2016고단835

-광주지방법원 2013.02.13 2012노2295