logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.01.29 2018가단10357
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant calculated the Plaintiff’s KRW 70,00,000 as well as the annual interest rate of KRW 15% from April 24, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

On January 5, 2017, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract for the new construction of a factory in Yangju-si with the Defendant for the contract amount of KRW 528 million, and on February 21, 2017, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract for the additional construction work equivalent to KRW 12 million, not for the contract, and the Plaintiff received a contract for the late payment of KRW 132 million from the Defendant around May 16, 2017, and KRW 286 million for late June 1, 2017, and received KRW 50 million for late payment of KRW 20 million around September 21, 2017, and the Defendant’s factory completed on October 10, 2017, there is no dispute.

Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid construction cost of KRW 70 million.

(1) The Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the occurrence of spreading the floor due to the defect of tamp; (c) the occurrence of melting parts of the floor connecting the floor of the sn beam beam; (d) the generation of dust due to the deterioration of external concrete products; (e) the generation of dust due to the malfunction of external concrete products; (vi) the occurrence of dust from the string of the outside panel; (vi) the occurrence of pollution or painting due to the towing, the absence of management; (vii) the lack of water-proof treatment of the parts related to the inner concrete retaining wall; (8) the shortage of water-flowing parts due to water leakage; (iv) the occurrence of water-resistant parts due to the malfunction of some sections; (v) the occurrence of water-resistant parts due to the malfunction of the floors; (v) the occurrence of water-resistant parts due to the lack of water-flow; and (v) the absence of sufficient height and proof of rainwater flow into the floor; and (v) the absence of sufficient indoor evidence such as rainwater flow.

Thus, we accept the plaintiff's claim and order the defendant to pay the money stated in the order.

arrow