logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.09.26 2019나11785
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

The reasoning of the lower court’s explanation in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment (excluding the conclusion part), which is the same as stated in the part of the reasoning of the first instance judgment (excluding the conclusion part) after deducting any addition or dismissal below, thereby citing it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the

Part 2 of the decision of the court of first instance which is added or revised shall be the reasons for the decision of the court of first instance.

The following shall be added to paragraph 4 below (not more than 3).

Of the instant construction works, the Plaintiff asserts that “The part to be executed by the Plaintiff is limited to concrete typology, frame, board, electricity, and electricity, and civil engineering works are not the scope of the Plaintiff’s construction under the instant construction contract.” Among defective items, the Plaintiff asserts that “the occurrence of the phenomenon that toilets and drinking water is iceed due to failure to perform construction works at the outside bottom of the building,” and “the non-construction works at the outside floor of the building falls under civil engineering works, and the non-construction works at the outside floor of the building are not the Plaintiff’s responsibility.” According to Article 21 of the instant construction contract (A evidence 1-1, 2-2), all corporations stipulate that all the Defendant will proceed with the construction works at the bottom of the Plaintiff, on the basis of the design map of the instant construction works (A), and according to Article 21 of the said contract, “the construction works at the outside bottom of a factory at the foundation of civil engineering works,” the Plaintiff’s assertion that the construction works at the first instance judgment should be included in the scope of civil construction works.”

The following shall be added to paragraph 14 below (not more than 5 pages):

As to this, the plaintiff demanded the reinforcement of steel bars, the plaintiff used concrete typified typing strings to cover them, changed the stairs design five times, and the bottoming work was demanded to be carried out in a separate company with a special shooting, and 1.

arrow