logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.15 2015나2057544
지체상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following judgments are added under Chapter 9, Chapter 20, of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. As to the additional portion, the Plaintiff: (a) up to June 19, 2014, eight items, such as “unconstruction by the Defendants’ completion date (of June 18, 2014),” including “construction by the low-rise floor parking lot sawt construction by the hospital,” “top the wall sawt construction by the hospital,” “top the floor, floor, free construction by the first floor; (b) connecting passage floor, wall gate; (c) construction by the outside room; (d) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; and (e) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; (e) construction by the outside room; and (e) construction by the outside section 2, construction by the outside room.614.2.

arrow