logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.15 2017고단1024
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A is a person who is in charge of general responsibility as the head of the headquarters of a stock company B established after obtaining a license for slaughter of livestock products in the Southern-gun D, Nam-gun.

The slaughter, treatment, and collection of livestock and the processing, packaging, preservation, and distribution of livestock products shall comply with the processing standards and components standards of livestock products, and water used for the treatment and processing of livestock products (No. 2016-48 of the Food and Drug Safety Notice) shall meet the water quality standards under the Food and Drug Control Act, and shall be maintained and managed permanently to prevent mixing of foreign substances or from being contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms, etc., as prescribed by the processing standards and components standards of livestock products.

On August 10, 2016, the Defendant detected 0.080mg/L (base value 0.05mg/L) 630,000,0000/100l (base value 5,000/100 below/100 ml) in total 3 lives lives, 0.00m / L/L (base value 0.005m/L) (base value 0.05m/L) in a lives lives lives lives 0.0m / 010m / L (base value 5,000 / 00 ml) (base value 0.05m /L) in total lives lives 420,000,000 m/ lives nives nives nives lives nives lives lives n

B. Defendant B Co., Ltd. did not comply with the processing standards and ingredients specifications of livestock products in the process, treatment, and collection of livestock and the processing, packing, preservation, and distribution of livestock products, such as the detection of biphenyls and fums, which are specific harmful substances, in relation to the Defendant’s business at the same time and at the same place as above (A).

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by this Court, the following facts are recognized.

1) The factory of Defendant B, Inc. (hereinafter “instant factory”) located in Jeon Sung-gun, Nam-gun.

arrow