The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the violation of water quality standards related to the summary of the grounds for appeal, although it is necessary to verify whether the polydiol contained in the feed of the chickens as alleged by the defendant on the grounds of the biphenyl detected by the defendant through appraisal, the court below did not confirm this and acquitted the defendant of this part of the facts charged without confirming it. The court below erred in the misapprehension of the deliberation.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case 1) Defendant A is a person who is responsible for general affairs as the head of the headquarters of a stock company, which was established after obtaining a license for slaughter of livestock products in the former Southern-gun D.

The slaughter, treatment, and collection of livestock and the processing, packaging, preservation, and distribution of livestock products shall comply with the processing standards and components standards of livestock products, and water used for the treatment and processing of livestock products (No. 2016-48 of the Food and Drug Safety Notice) shall meet the water quality standards under the Food and Drug Control Act and shall be maintained and managed permanently to prevent mixing of foreign substances or from being contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms, etc., as prescribed by the processing standards and components standards of livestock products.

On August 10, 2016, the Defendant detected 0.080mg/L (base value 0.05mg/L) 630,000,0000/100l (base value 5,000/100 below/100 ml) in total 3 lives lives, 0.00m / L/L (base value 0.005m/L) (base value 0.05m/L) in a lives lives lives lives 0.0m / 010m / L (base value 5,000 / 00 ml) (base value 0.05m /L) in total lives lives 420,000,000 m/ lives nives nives nives lives nives lives lives n

2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. is at the same time and place as above 1) and at the same time and place, A, an employee of the Defendant, as above.