All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fines of KRW 3 million for each of the defendant A, B, C, and R, the fines of KRW 2 million for the defendant D, E, F, G, H, K, and N: Each of the fines of KRW 1 million for the defendant S, the defendant S, and W: each of the fines of KRW 700,000,000 for the defendant S, and the defendant I, J, L, M, P, Q, Q, T, and U: 50,000 for each of the fines of KRW 70,000,000 for the defendant S, and the defendant S, and W are deemed to be unfair.

2. In order to enforce the collective agreement that the victim AC entered into with the Korean Construction Workers' Union, the Defendants held the scene of the victim AE apartment construction with the victim’s members of the headquarters AD and 800 members belonging to the headquarters AE apartment. The Defendants held an assembly by using the speaker of the broadcasting vehicle and held an assembly using the speaker of the broadcast vehicle to provide relief such as “AC water ra, AI scarra,” and thereby, the employees working at the construction site are heavier than the victim’s new apartment construction work by interfering with the victim’s new apartment construction work by letting the workers working at the construction site stop work.

However, among the 23 Defendants 23, there are 13 persons who were initial offenders or who had no record of punishment for the same kind of crime. Defendant F and V have no record of punishment exceeding the fine for the same crime. The Defendants recognized the mistake of the crime of this case and are against the law.

After completing a distance from the victim’s implementation of the collective agreement, the Defendants planned to complete the finishing assembly at the construction site of the instant case and dissolve the Defendants, but the head of the branch office AD was going to enter the site in a situation where three members are getting up at the time of the work site, and the Defendants and the participants of the assembly were able to take into account the circumstances of the crime, as they did so contingently.

Since the instant crime was committed from around 16:20 to 18:05 on November 1, 2013, from around 16:20 to around 18:05, the time during which the victim’s duties were obstructed is shorter. On December 5, 2013, the victim AC and the AI Co., Ltd. agreed with the Democratic Z Construction Branch and withdraw the complaint against the Defendants.