Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 19:50 on September 27, 2019, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the C heading Steering Committee located on the second underground floor of building B in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) at the same time, after being aware of the fact that the victim D (59 tax) was gathered by executives of the B building management, and arbitrarily found the fact that he had an extraordinary meeting, and (c) to the victim, whether the Defendant “convened and decided without the management rules;

Does it be reported as an illegal organization, why it is and why it attends the unresistant speech;

“Along with a large sound,” continuing to be “Is the son,” and for about 35 minutes of a large noise, the victim’s extraordinary meeting operation was obstructed by force by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocols of examination of witnesses regarding D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Kakao Stockholm Act to the content of conversation;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order provides that the Defendant shall continuously slander the Defendant, who is the former operating chairperson at the Stockholm, etc. of the current operating chairperson D, and thus, the Defendant shall claim from September 27, 2019, that the special meeting of the operating committee scheduled to start from September 27, 2019 was followed only before the special meeting of the operating committee was convened, not exercising force, and that it constitutes a justifiable act.

The defendant has the authority to attend a meeting as long as he/she is not an operating member.

In addition, according to the evidence duly examined by this court, even though the defendant criticizes and takes a desire to criticize D in the meeting place and demands D to leave the defendant at the meeting place, it can be acknowledged that the above act has been continued for 35 minutes until the police called the defendant, and under the above circumstances, the meeting of the steering committee was not started due to the defendant's act and interfered with it.