1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons why the court of this case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following 2.3 to the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420
2. Details to be added; and
A. Part 1 of the Disciplinary Reason No. 1) The Plaintiff asserts that the Secretary-General, who does not have the right to attend a meeting, is not obligated to comply with the Plaintiff’s request because he/she prevented the Plaintiff from speaking without obtaining permission from the chairperson of the steering committee with the right to attend a meeting and interfered with the meeting of the operating committee. According to the overall purport of evidence No. 4-1, evidence No. 6-1, evidence No. 17, and evidence No. 18, and video and oral arguments, the Secretary-General, who is in fact stationed in the meeting with the chairperson of the operating committee with the approval of the chairperson in order to assist the operating committee. The Plaintiff is not a member of the operating committee, and the Plaintiff is well aware that he/she is unable to speak without permission from the chairperson of the operating committee since he/she is not a member of the operating committee, and the chairman of the operating committee is unable to leave the meeting with no permission or understanding, and the Plaintiff’s request for suspension of the meeting cannot be accepted by the chairperson of the operating committee.