The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As stated in the facts charged, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged against the victim E even though there was no injury to the victim E, there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly examined and adopted by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts and the result of the instant pleadings, the facts charged by the Defendant, which caused the injury to the victim by plucking, digging up, and plucking the victim’s arms at the time and time indicated in the facts charged, may

① The victim stated in the court below that G, the main point of “D” was “D,” and that he was aware that he was a criminal.

② Although G appeared as a witness in the court of the original instance and made a consistent statement with the prosecutor’s inquiry as to the contents and facts charged to police officers, G refused to make a statement several times at an investigative agency due to the risk of the Defendant, and made it impossible for G to make the contents of the statement known to the Defendant. In light of the body of the police officer’s statement and the background leading up to the reversal of the statement, G’s legal statement in the original court is difficult to believe.

③ In the recording of an investigation report (D business owner, call, witness, telephone call, visit and investigation), and recording file, G state that the Defendant had plucked up the arms of the victim, and stated that the Defendant has plucked up the arms of the victim. The statement of 112 reported cases is also written that the Defendant has plicked the arms of the victim.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. The Defendant on the assertion of unfair sentencing was suspended due to violent crimes.