logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.04.27 2015고단2269
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On June 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, and completed the execution of the sentence on February 14, 2015.

[2] On August 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 10:40 on August 1, 2015, on the ground that: (b) the victim E (68 years old) who performed alcohol in the place of “D” was found to have inflicted an injury on the part of the victim E (68 years old) on the part of the victim’s left part; (c) plucking up and pluck up the part of the victim’s shoulder hand hand, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment to the victim; and (d) the Defendant sustained an injury on the part of the left part of the bridge, which requires

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s partial statement (a statement to the effect that there is a fact between the date, time, and place of the facts charged) of the Defendant’s legal statement (a statement to the effect that there is a fact between the date, time, and place of the facts charged) and the recording file of each legal statement of E and F, and criminal investigation report (D business owner, telephone, witness, telephone, and visiting investigation): 6 copies of the facts charged, such as a statement of inquiry

The injured person E stated that the injured person is not the defendant or the injured person is not aware of his/her identity, but according to the evidence above, the fact that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim is sufficiently recognized.

G is consistent with the prosecutor’s question as to the contents and facts charged that he appeared as a witness in this court and stated to police officers. However, G refused to make a statement several times at an investigative agency due to fear of harm to the defendant, and made it impossible to inform the defendant of the contents of the statement. G’s legal statement is difficult to believe when G is based on the existence of the contents stated in the police officer and the circumstance leading up to the reversal of the statement. When G’s legal statement is based on Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 35 of the Criminal Act, the reason for sentencing [the scope of recommended punishment] of Article 1 (6 months to 3 years] of the general aggravated area (a special aggravated person].

arrow