logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.07.06 2018고정403
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was in a state that is not good in appraisal as a matter of divorce lawsuit recently due to the relationship between the victim C (35 years and women) and the marital relationship.

On October 18, 2017, around 01:40, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as a plucking or plucking of the victim's own cell phone from the 204, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, that caused the victim's own cell phone to be used twice again, which requires four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. References to factual inquiries with E good faith;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The defendant asserts that he reported internal death [the defendant only sought to catch a victim under the influence of alcohol and did not have assaulted the victim.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, the fact that the defendant suffered an injury that plupage cages plup at the victim’s arms in the process of pluping or pluping the victim to cut off the cell phone from the victim.

① The Defendant explained the circumstances of the case to the police officers immediately after the instant case, and stated the facts of plucking, plucking, and plucking, etc. of the victim’s cell phone two times (Evidence No. 5 pages). The Defendant corresponds to the statements made by the victim that “When plucking, plucking, and cutting off and cutting off the cell phone of the Defendant, the Defendant did so.”

② On October 19, 2017, the date following the instant case was diagnosed as a cage at the F Hospital.

This is different from inverte part (vertebrate) in 201, and there is a high probability that the aggregate has occurred in this case.

③ From the day immediately after the instant case, the victim appealed to the police officer that he would not put the arms, and on the day of the instant case, the victim appealed to the right chest and the two arms, and stated in the record of the E-type and the medical affairs, that the victim complained of the pass on the right chest and the two arms, and stated that “the sale was made by another person and caused a pain.”

Application of Statutes

1..

arrow