The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is only the victim's self-harm, and the defendant does not inflict any injury on the victim;

2. The court below found the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below: ① the defendant consistently stated that the defendant suffered an injury, such as the victim's opening the victim's arms, leaving away from the view of opening the victim's arms, and getting out of the victim's arms; ② He reversed the telephone statement made by the investigative agency that there was no fact that the defendant and the victim appeared to fight the body of the defendant and the victim or the reasons why the victim suffered from the victim suffered from the victim; although he testified that the defendant and the victim appeared to dispute about the passage of the victim's arms, the defendant's statement is consistent (the trial record 217-222 pages, and H appears to have been opened by the defendant), ③ the damaged parts, pictures and descriptions of the victim's testimony conform to the victim's statements (the evidence records 10-17, etc.). However, the court below found the facts that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.