A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 17, 2013, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a vehicle B in the section of approximately 2 km from the wind-free distance in Kimpo-si to the front of the Kimpo-si’s funeral hall located in the same Dong, while under the influence of alcohol at around 22:19 on April 17, 2013, the Defendant driven a vehicle B in the direction of approximately 2 km from the wind-free distance in Kimpo-si to the front of the funeral hall located in the same Dong.

2. On April 17, 2013, the Defendant issued a two-class ordinary driver’s license issued by the Seoul Commissioner of the Seoul Police Agency to pretend that the Defendant would have been aware that the Defendant would be punished for a person who was requested to produce a driver’s license and a non-exclusive driver’s license in front of the Kimpo-dong in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the Kimpo-si, the traffic control department of the Kimpo-si Police Station at the Kimpo-si, and presented that the Defendant would have been punished as a driver’s license.

Accordingly, the defendant denied D's driver's license, which is an official document.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, is likely to be punished for drinking or unlicensed driving, and without authority, had the intent to gather DNA’s personal information, and without authority, had the Defendant enter D’s resident registration numbers, etc. based on the Defendant’s statement, the Defendant forged one copy of the Defendant’s circumstantial report in the name of the said D, which is a private document concerning the certification of the fact by signing the “D” and affixing a seal, using a pen in the column for the confirmation of the driver’s identity of the site for the driver’s circumstantial report. In other words, the Defendant, without knowledge of the fact, issued the said fact-finding report to the said policeman C as if it was duly constituted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. License register;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of a host driver;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;