logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.12.21 2017고단2126
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 6, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch branch branch branch (driving) and a summary order of KRW 7 million as a fine for the same crime in the same court on October 19, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) in violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driven a Crac vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.156% alcohol concentration at the section of about 4km in front of the yellow-gu tunnels, Busan, from the front of the “quasicosing” located in the optical-dong located in the Young-gu, Busan, without obtaining a driver’s license on July 23, 2017.

2. The Defendant: (a) forged a private signature; and (b) discovered a drinking driver at a time and place as referred to in Paragraph (1) of this Article at the time and place; and (c) stated that there was no identification card to verify the identity of the Defendant, the Defendant’s seat manager, who was out of the Republic of Korea, issued a prior resident registration number of E, who was the Defendant’s seat.

Accordingly, a portable police information terminal (PDA) prepared by D was requested to sign the confirmation driver's signature column as a result of the control of drinking driving of the PDA, and the signature of another person was forged for the purpose of exercising by electronically signing as if he was the signature of E on the screen of the above device amount, and the above forged signature was actually formed, presenting it to the Gyeong who knew of the above fact.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, stated the “E” in the driver’s statement column of the document in which he/she was demanded to sign the “A” report on the situation of the driver’s driver’s oral driving under which he/she continues to control the driving of alcohol at the horse at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, and indicated the “E” in the column of the driver’s statement, and then, the Defendant is a private document on the proof of facts for the purpose of uttering by signing the document next thereto.

arrow