logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.02.05 2020고단9211
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On February 20, 2019, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Incheon District Court. On May 13, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) at the Incheon District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 22, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a alcohol) driving a E-motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.051% of alcohol concentration in blood without obtaining a driver’s license from the front line of C main points located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, to around 22:46 on the same day.

2. On September 22, 2020, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) around September 22, 2020, the Defendant informed that he was a resident registration number of a pro-Japanese G who was going to the outside of his country and was exposed by drinking from the horse F belonging to the Southern-dong Police Station in Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, that he was the Defendant’s resident registration number and used the other person’s resident registration number unlawfully.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 2 above, was asked to sign an inquiry on the result of the police PDA (portable information terminal)’s crackdown on drinking driving control, where G’s personal information is recorded, and signed as “G” in the electronic signature column while the Defendant was driving as G. As such, the Defendant submitted an inquiry about the results of the crackdown on drinking driving with forged signature to the horse F, and exercised it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the signature of G name without authority, and submitted a written inquiry about the result of the crackdown on drinking driving by forging the signature of G to the F.

4. The Defendant who forged a private document or carried out a falsified investigation document shall be in the column for the driver’s name of the main driver’s statement report, which was issued by the horse FF at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2.

arrow