A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2018, the Defendant received a 112 report of assaulting a taxi engineer in front of the 233-U.S. J. K. K. K. K. 2, 2018, on June 22, 2018, and received a request from C and policeman D to present his identification card. The Defendant, “C I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am.”

C. As we ambling in drinking by a large sound called “Sweaks and A.I.D.”, as we would ambling in drinking, and as we would ambling in drinking, to Swe. D, “I. ambling, I. ambling, I. ambling.”

The 112 Report Processing Service was obstructed by assaulting the victims, such as breaking D's chest and face into their own head, while taking the bath as C's head, thereby obstructing the victims' legitimate performance of their official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C or D;

1. A written E (No. 3 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing CCTV images;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following factors shall be considered in favor of the defendant among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Order [the scope of a recommendation] No person who has no person [special sentencing person] in the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the special sentencing person] [the decision of sentence] [the Defendant’s crime of this case requires a strict punishment for committing a crime against public authority in order to establish a State’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority, as it prevents a police official from performing his/her legitimate duties in the process of reporting a case, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish a crime against public authority. Thus, the above crime and the nature of the crime are not weak.

However, the fact that the accused recognizes his mistake and seriously reflects it, and criminal punishment exceeding the fine is the criminal record of the accused.