A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 17, 2017, the Defendant interfering with his/her business: (a) was drunk in the Eac shop of the victim D in Daegu-dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on January 17, 2017; and (b) was under the influence of alcohol in the Eac shop, “Ise spath and the f

It is why why this m is galle, and why it interferes with it;

“Absing to the above coffee customers, the said coffee made a disturbance, such as taking a bath at the coffee shop and the coffee shop parking lot for about 40 minutes, by having the customers who were in the said coffee shop go out, thereby interfering with the business of the victimized person’s coffee by force.

2. On January 17, 2017, the Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties was requested to return home from the police officer G, a police officer of the F District, called Frane, who was called out after receiving a 112 report by the Defendant’s act as referred to in paragraph 1, at the E coffee shop located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2017.

During the breath of the police breath of the police breath of the police breath of the police breath of the breath of the police breath of the police breath of the breath of this breath, breath of the breath of this breath, breath of the breath of this breath of the breath of the breath of this breath of the breath of the breath of this breath of the breath of the breath of this breath of the police breath of the breath of

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of related photographs and statutes on the place of work;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the punishment imposed on a person who interferes with the performance of public duties by mutual consent and by obstructing the performance of public duties by mutual consent and by committing a crime with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Aggravation concurrent crimes;