logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.02.04 2015고단2629
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2015, the Defendant was recommended to return home only because the problem of the non-standing of the fluence between the Defendant and the taxi engineer was resolved from the slope E belonging to the D District Police Station D in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si.

The Defendant lost a wall and a mobile phone, and the Defendant was able to avoid hump and disturbance while making it difficult to ask questions about the circumstances of loss in accordance with the process of receipt of loss from the above E, and, upon being asked about the process of receipt of loss from the above E, the Defendant was able to find out how and how and how and how and how and how and how and how the name was known, and whether he was able to find out the name in the wall;

Nurvia, this chron, “A bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” refused to make a statement about the receipt of loss, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties by assaulting, such as refusing to stop the statement about the receipt of loss of tobacco used in hand, and preventing the above E’s chest from taking the face of the above E, continuing to take the head, and taking the above DNA entrance more strongly, and taking the door more than several times, on several occasions, the vehicle forcibly obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (A bath, etc.) and investigation report (limited to CCTV photographs attached to DNA);

1. Application of each on-site photograph of each victim, and CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on community service and lecture attendance order [the scope of recommended punishment] There is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 4 months) (the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] [the fact that the nature of the crime is poor, such as continuing the desire for police officers performing their duties under the influence of alcohol and exercising violence, etc., it is necessary to strictly punish the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties in order to establish the state's legal order and eradicate the light of the public authority, and the trial procedure is absent, and the court also has the disturbance.

arrow