beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny for six months at the Suwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on September 5, 2015, but the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 17, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2016, which became final and conclusive on September 7, 2016. The sentence of the said suspension of execution was invalidated on January 26, 2017, which was paroled on March 13, 2017 in the Suwon District Court.
"2017 Highest 3851" Defendant planned to steals goods after being employed at a convenience store with the knowledge that cash, etc. can be easily stolen at the convenience store and at the convenience store safe during a night time set by the owner of the business.
1. On May 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed the crime against the Victim C at the convenience store in the operation of the victim in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, in a manner that the Defendant was stolen by putting the victim’s cash amounting to KRW 1,500,000, which is the victim’s possession in the saving depository for the location of the victim, out of any crebs that the victim left, using the crebs that the victim left, and generated approximately KRW 275,00,000, cultural merchandise coupon amounting to KRW 49,50,000, and KRW 11,00,000 in the market price.
2. On May 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed a crime against the Victim F, with the victim’s money amounting to KRW 1,500,000, and KRW 660,000, a cultural gift certificate, owned by the victim, by taking advantage of any cresh in the victim’s E convenience store located in Pyeongtaek-si G, while leaving the victim at the convenience store for the management of the victim.
3. The Defendant committed the crime against the Victim H at around 01:50 on May 18, 2017, at the convenience point in the operation of the victim in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, the Defendant used the gap of the victim’s retirement and then used the difference of the victim’s leaving from his/her office, and used the difference of the victim’s cash of KRW 620,000, KRW 900,000, and KRW 270,000.