A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny of intrusion on night buildings;

A. On January 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 04:00, prior to the “Eart” of the victim’s D operation in Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si; (b) if the victim set aside and opened the Maart window that did not correct any crepits due to the victim’s leaving the Maart; and (c) if the victim’s market price that was in the display stand by intrusion upon the Maart and was in the display stand amounting to KRW 3,00,000, the Defendant stolen the Defendant’s 6,600,000, total market price, such as five grouping 1 factoring, and 1 factoring in the market price of KRW 3,600,00.

B. On January 13, 2017, around 04:00, the Defendant: (a) opened the Maart window that did not correct any crepits due to the leaving of the victim D; and (b) opened a small-sized credit cooperative for calculating the place of the Maart to open the 5,000 won 40 cash worth worth KRW 200,000, the victim’s possession, which was kept in the Maart.

(c)

On January 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 04:10, in front of the “G Hague shop” operated by the Victim F, who is located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si; (b) removed the above Hague shop windows that did not correct any gaps due to the leaving of the Defendant; and (c) infringed upon the Hague shop and opened the said Hague-gu small-sized safe for calculating its location, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s cash worth of KRW 30,000, totaling 300,000, which was kept in the said room.

2. On January 21, 2017, the Defendant attempted to larceny a structure at night (i.e., theft) and (ii) opened a warehouse and opened a small-sized credit cooperative in the place where the victim was absent and did not correct any crebs in EMt “E” as stated in paragraph (1) of Article 1, around 04:17, the Defendant did not have money inside the said small credit cooperative and did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

Application of the Police Statement D to the Defendant’s legal statement D, F’s CCTV photographic Acts and subordinate statutes

1. The corresponding criminal provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime; and