logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 03. 27. 선고 2013두25771 판결
(심리불속행) 증여행위를 대리하여 채권을 지급받은 것이라면 대리자는 수증자에 해당하지 않고, 실질 수증자에게 증여세부과처분하여야함[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu38406 ( October 23, 2013)

Title

If a claim is paid on behalf of a donee for a gift act, the agent shall not be the donee, but shall impose the gift tax on the actual donee.

Summary

(1) If, even if a claim was received in advance from the inheritee, it does not constitute a gift, and it does not constitute a gift, so the donee should be imposed and disposed of as gift tax on the person who actually received the claim.

Cases

2013Du2571 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

-Appellee

AAAA One person.

Defendant-Appellant

-Appellee

b Head of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu38406 Decided October 23, 2013

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow